team: be important to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organization 1.00
be important for organization 0.99
be vital to organization 0.93
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(staff, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(team, be important to organization)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important for organization)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(team, be vital to organization)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(team, be important for organization)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, be vital to organization)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(team, be vital to organization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(team, be important for organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(team, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(team, be vital to organization)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(team, be important for organization)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(team, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(team, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(team, be important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(team, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)