team: be in sports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in sports 1.00
have sports 0.99
have better sports 0.93
is sport 0.84
be used in athletics 0.81
be bad at soccer 0.80
is basketball 0.78
improve in soccer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(league, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(league, is sport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(league, is sport)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, is sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, be in sports)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, have sports)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(team, have sports)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, is sport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(team, be bad at soccer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(team, is sport)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(team, is basketball)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, have sports)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(team, improve in soccer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(team, have sports)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(team, is basketball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(team, is sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(team, is sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, have better sports)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(team, be used in athletics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(team, improve in soccer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(team, be bad at soccer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(team, is basketball)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(team, have better sports)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(team, have better sports)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(team, improve in soccer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(team, be bad at soccer)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(team, be used in athletics)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(team, is basketball)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(team, improve in soccer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, be bad at soccer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(team, be in sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(league, is sport)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lacrosse, is sport)