team: be used in athletics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in athletics 1.00
be in sports 0.81
have sports 0.81
is basketball 0.80
have better sports 0.77
is sport 0.77
be bad at soccer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(league, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(league, is sport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(league, is sport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, is sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(team, be used in athletics)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(team, be in sports)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(team, have sports)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(team, is basketball)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, be in sports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, have sports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(team, is sport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(team, is basketball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(team, be in sports)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(team, have sports)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(team, is sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(team, is sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, have better sports)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(team, is basketball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(team, be bad at soccer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, have sports)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(team, be bad at soccer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(team, have better sports)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(team, have better sports)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, is sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(team, is basketball)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(team, be bad at soccer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, be bad at soccer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(team, be used in athletics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(league, is sport)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lacrosse, is sport)