team: get points in hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
get points in hockey 1.00
get points in basketball 0.90
get points in nhl 0.84
is basketball 0.80
be bad at soccer 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(team, get points in hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(team, get points in basketball)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(team, get points in basketball)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(team, get points in basketball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(team, is basketball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(team, is basketball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(team, is basketball)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, be bad at soccer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(team, be bad at soccer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(team, get points in basketball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(team, be bad at soccer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(team, is basketball)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(team, be bad at soccer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(team, get points in hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(team, get points in hockey)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, get points in hockey)