team: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
have better sports 0.78
be at better home 0.77
be better than purple 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(league, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(league, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(league, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(team, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, have better sports)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(team, be better than purple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(team, be better than purple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(team, have better sports)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(team, have better sports)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(team, be better than purple)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(team, be better than purple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(league, has quality better)