:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(squad, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(team, work)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(squad, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(squad, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(staff, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(squad, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(team, work)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(staff, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(staff, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(lacrosse, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, work)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, work)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(team, is work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(team, is work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(team, is work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(team, is work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(team, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(squad, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(staff, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lacrosse, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(team, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(squad, work)