teapot: is dome scandal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, article
Weight: 0.53
, piece
Weight: 0.50
Siblings vase
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, brooch
Weight: 0.34
, spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dome scandal 1.00
is dome scandal important 0.99
is dome scandal significance 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(teapot, is dome scandal)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(teapot, is dome scandal important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(teapot, is dome scandal significance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(teapot, is dome scandal significance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(teapot, is dome scandal important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(teapot, is dome scandal significance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(teapot, is dome scandal important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal significance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(teapot, is dome scandal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(teapot, is dome scandal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(teapot, is dome scandal)