technology: be useful in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in science 1.00
be important to science 0.93
be important in science 0.93
be useful tool in science 0.92
be used in science 0.91
be related to science 0.88
be related in science 0.88
be different from science 0.88
affect science 0.87
be same as science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful tool in science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(technology, be useful tool in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technology, be useful tool in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(technology, affect science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful tool in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, affect science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)