technology: has state world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state world 1.00
is male-dominated world 0.91
be in new world 0.86
has state problem 0.78
was used in world war 1 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(technology, has state world)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(technology, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(technology, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(technology, was used in world war 1)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(technology, was used in world war 1)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(technology, was used in world war 1)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(technology, was used in world war 1)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(technology, has state world)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(technology, has state world)