technology: was used in world war 1

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in world war 1 1.00
is male-dominated world 0.79
be in new world 0.78
has state world 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(technology, was used in world war 1)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(technology, has state world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(technology, has state world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(technology, has state world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(technology, is male-dominated world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(technology, is male-dominated world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(technology, was used in world war 1)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(technology, was used in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(technology, was used in world war 1)