telemarketer: be allowed to numbers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents caller
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.31
, florist
Weight: 0.31
, creditor
Weight: 0.31
, spammer
Weight: 0.31
, business card
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed to numbers 1.00
use numbers 0.89
be allowed to spoof numbers 0.82
use local numbers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(telemarketer, use numbers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(telemarketer, use numbers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(telemarketer, use numbers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, be allowed to spoof numbers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, use numbers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, use local numbers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(telemarketer, use local numbers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to spoof numbers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(telemarketer, use local numbers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(telemarketer, use local numbers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to spoof numbers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to spoof numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(telemarketer, be allowed to numbers)