telemarketer: is vegan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents caller
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.31
, florist
Weight: 0.31
, creditor
Weight: 0.31
, spammer
Weight: 0.31
, business card
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vegan 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, is vegan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(barber shop, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(barber shop, is vegan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(telemarketer, is vegan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, is vegan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(telemarketer, is vegan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barber shop, is vegan)