:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
work |
1.00 |
job |
0.76 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(caller, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(telemarketer, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(caller, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(telemarketer, work)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(caller, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(caller, job)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(caller, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(caller, job)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spammer, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(caller, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(caller, job)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spammer, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(caller, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(telemarketer, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(caller, job)