telephone numbers: be stored as text

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer database
Weight: 0.32
, contact
Weight: 0.31
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, computer file
Weight: 0.30
, identifier
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stored as text 1.00
be stored 0.87
be stored electronicly 0.87
get stored 0.86
be stored online 0.86
be stored in files 0.85
be stored in qr code 0.85
be stored in computer 0.85
be stored in things 0.84
be stored in database 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(information, be stored electronicly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(information, be stored in qr code)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(information, be stored online)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(information, be stored)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(information, be stored in computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(information, be stored in computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(information, be stored)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(information, be stored electronicly)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(information, be stored online)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(information, be stored in qr code)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored in computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored electronicly)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored in qr code)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored online)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer file, be stored in computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(information, be stored electronicly)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(information, be stored)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(information, be stored online)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(information, be stored in qr code)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(information, be stored in computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer file, be stored in computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(computer file, be stored in computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(telephone numbers, be stored as text)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored in database)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored in database)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(telephone numbers, be stored in database)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored in database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(information, be stored)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(information, be stored in computer)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(information, be stored electronicly)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(information, be stored online)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(information, be stored in qr code)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(computer file, be stored in computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(information, be stored)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(information, be stored in computer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(information, be stored electronicly)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(information, be stored online)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(telephone numbers, be stored as text)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(information, be stored in qr code)