telephone: is invention

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is invention 1.00
be invention 1.00
is best invention 0.95
is great invention 0.94
be helpful invention 0.90
is invented 0.86
were invented 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mobile phone, is best invention)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mobile phone, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, were invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(telephone, is invention)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great invention)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(telephone, is great invention)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(telephone, is invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(telephone, is great invention)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(telephone, is great invention)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(telephone, is invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(telephone, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(telephone, is invention)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is invention)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mobile phone, were invented)