telephone: were useful in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were useful in past 1.00
were like like past 0.87
be useful 0.83
is useful 0.82
be useful for children 0.79
have emojis 0.77
be useful in schools 0.77
be helpful 0.77
were needed 0.76
were really needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(utility, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(telephone, were useful in past)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(telephone, were useful in past)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(telephone, were useful in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(network, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(utility, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(utility, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful in schools)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be helpful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were really needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(utility, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(telephone, were useful in past)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(telephone, were useful in past)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(telephone, were useful in past)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(computer network, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(computer network, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cellphone, be helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be helpful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cellphone, were really needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were really needed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be useful in schools)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(telephone, were useful in past)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(telephone, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(telephone, is useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(telephone, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(telephone, be useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(telephone, were needed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(telephone, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(telephone, be useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(telephone, were needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(telephone, were needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(telephone, were useful in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utility, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cellphone, were needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cellphone, were really needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer network, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellphone, be helpful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, were like like past)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be useful in schools)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(telephone, were useful in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utility, is useful)