telescope: be non useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio telescope
Weight: 0.39
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be non useful 1.00
be useful 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(telescope, be non useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laser, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(telescope, be non useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laser, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(laser, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(telescope, be non useful)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(telescope, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be non useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(telescope, be non useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(laser, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(telescope, be non useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)