television: be considered technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered technology 1.00
is technology 0.92
be considered art 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cinema, be considered art)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(radio, is technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(radio, is technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(radio, is technology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cinema, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cinema, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(television, be considered technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(television, be considered technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(television, be considered technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(radio, is technology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(television, be considered technology)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cinema, be considered art)