television: be different from television in 1950s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from television in 1950s 1.00
be different from television 1.00
be called television 0.91
be better than television 0.91
compare with television 0.89
be one broadcast across country 0.85
be one broadcast 0.85
be more popular than radio 0.81
be better than radio 0.80
be better than tv 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio, compare with television)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than tv)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radio, be one broadcast across country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radio, compare with television)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radio, be one broadcast across country)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(television, be different from television in 1950s)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, be called television)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(television, be called television)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(television, be better than radio)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(television, be better than radio)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(television, be better than radio)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(television, be more popular than radio)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(television, be more popular than radio)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(television, be more popular than radio)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(television, be called television)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(television, be more popular than radio)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(television, be called television)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(television, be different from television in 1950s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radio, compare with television)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(radio, be better than tv)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(television, be different from television in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio, be one broadcast across country)