television: is more popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more popular 1.00
is popular 0.92
be like pewdiepie popular 0.88
become popular 0.88
was popular 0.88
was popular in 1930s 0.88
were popular in 1930s 0.86
be more popular than radio 0.85
be as popular as ever 0.84
get more expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(channel, become popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(television, is more popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cable, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(television, is more popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(channel, become popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cable, get more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cable, get more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(channel, become popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(television series, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radio, was popular in 1930s)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(radio, were popular in 1930s)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(channel, become popular)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(television, is more popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cable, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(television, is more popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(television series, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(television series, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cinema, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cinema, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radio, was popular in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(radio, was popular in 1930s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(radio, were popular in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(radio, were popular in 1930s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(television, is more popular)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(television, be more popular than radio)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(television, be more popular than radio)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(television, be more popular than radio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(television, be more popular than radio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(television, is more popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(channel, become popular)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cable, get more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(television series, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cinema, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, was popular in 1930s)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, were popular in 1930s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(channel, become popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(television, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cable, get more expensive)