television: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was invented developed 0.92
was invented 0.81
was evolved 0.80
was used in nixton 0.78
were invented 0.78
is invented 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(radio, was invented developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cinema, was invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radio, were invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(radio, is invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(radio, was invented developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio, was invented developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cinema, was invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cinema, was invented)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(radio, is invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio, is invented)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radio, were invented)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio, were invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(television, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(television, was evolved)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(television, was used in nixton)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, was used in nixton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(television, was used in nixton)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(television, was used in nixton)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(television, is invented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(television, was evolved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(television, is invented)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(television, is invented)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(television, was evolved)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(television, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(television, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, was invented developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cinema, was invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, were invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is invented)