television: was evolved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was evolved 1.00
evolve in years 0.81
go evolve in years 0.80
was developed 0.80
go evolve 0.78
was invented developed 0.78
was changed 0.77
evolve in next years 0.76
go evolve in next years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cinema, go evolve in years)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cinema, go evolve in next years)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cinema, evolve in years)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cinema, go evolve)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cinema, evolve in next years)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(radio, was invented developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cinema, go evolve)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cinema, go evolve)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cinema, go evolve in years)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cinema, go evolve in years)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cinema, evolve in years)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cinema, evolve in years)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(radio, was invented developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio, was invented developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(cinema, evolve in next years)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cinema, evolve in next years)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cinema, go evolve in next years)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cinema, go evolve in next years)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(television, was evolved)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(television, was developed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(television, was developed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(television, was changed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(television, was developed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(television, was changed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(television, was changed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(television, was changed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(television, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(television, was evolved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cinema, go evolve)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cinema, go evolve in years)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cinema, go evolve in next years)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cinema, evolve in years)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, was invented developed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(television, was evolved)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cinema, evolve in next years)