television: was useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was useful 1.00
is useful 0.97
be useful 0.96
be more useful than radio 0.79
was used in nixton 0.77
be is used 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(radio, be useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radio, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(radio, is useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(radio, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(radio, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(radio, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(television, was useful)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(television, be more useful than radio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(television, be more useful than radio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(television, be more useful than radio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(television, was used in nixton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, was used in nixton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(television, be more useful than radio)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(television, was used in nixton)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(television, was used in nixton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(television, was useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(television, was useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(radio, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(television, was useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(radio, be useful)