teller: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.56
, magician
Weight: 0.53
, employee
Weight: 0.50
, scientist
Weight: 0.47
, great
Weight: 0.46
Siblings receptionist
Weight: 0.32
, salesperson
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31
, salesman
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
is paid little 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(waiter, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(waiter, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(waiter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(teller, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(teller, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(teller, is paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(teller, is paid little)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(teller, is paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(teller, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(teller, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(teller, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(waiter, is paid)