tenant: need contents insurance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings renter
Weight: 0.47
, landlord
Weight: 0.37
, buyer
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need contents insurance 1.00
need renters insurance 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(renter, need renters insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(renter, need renters insurance)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(renter, need renters insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tenant, need contents insurance)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tenant, need renters insurance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need renters insurance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tenant, need renters insurance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tenant, need renters insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need contents insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tenant, need contents insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need contents insurance)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(renter, need renters insurance)