tendency: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.68
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, condition
Weight: 0.57
Siblings stupidity
Weight: 0.53
, failing
Weight: 0.37
, attitude
Weight: 0.35
, inclination
Weight: 0.35
, laziness
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
be useful for person 0.88
be important in servicescapes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tendency, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tendency, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attitude, be useful for person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tendency, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tendency, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attitude, be useful for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(attitude, be useful for person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tendency, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tendency, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(attitude, be useful for person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(tendency, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)