tenderloin: be in san francisco called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loin
Weight: 0.59
, entree
Weight: 0.58
, cut
Weight: 0.54
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, pork
Weight: 0.52
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.36
, ravioli
Weight: 0.35
, salad
Weight: 0.35
, lasagna
Weight: 0.34
, chicken
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in san francisco called 1.00
be in san francisco 0.99
be dangerous san francisco 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be dangerous san francisco)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be in san francisco)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be in san francisco)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be dangerous san francisco)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be in san francisco)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be in san francisco)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be dangerous san francisco)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be dangerous san francisco)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be in san francisco called)