tennessee: have checkerboard end zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school
Weight: 0.64
, florida
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.36
, missouri
Weight: 0.36
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.36
, kentucky
Weight: 0.36
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have checkerboard end zones 1.00
have checkerboard end zone 0.98
have checkerboard endzones 0.90
be in two time zones 0.81
have two time zones 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, have two time zones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(kentucky, have two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(kentucky, have two time zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard endzones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard endzones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tennessee, be in two time zones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be in two time zones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tennessee, be in two time zones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard endzones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be in two time zones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard endzones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have checkerboard end zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(kentucky, have two time zones)