tennis court: has flat surface

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.68
, playground
Weight: 0.65
, golf course
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.64
Siblings basketball court
Weight: 0.82
, volleyball
Weight: 0.65
, supreme court
Weight: 0.39
, tennis
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has flat surface 1.00
be flat 0.88
has grass surface 0.84
has wood surface 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(basketball court, has wood surface)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(basketball court, has wood surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(basketball court, has wood surface)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tennis court, has flat surface)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(tennis court, be flat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be flat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis court, has grass surface)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has grass surface)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has grass surface)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tennis court, be flat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tennis court, has grass surface)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be flat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has flat surface)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tennis court, has flat surface)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has flat surface) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(basketball court, has wood surface)