tennis game: be at match

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.73
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, football game
Weight: 0.41
, baseball game
Weight: 0.41
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.39
, table tennis
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at match 1.00
be used to win tennis match 0.89
be at soccer game 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tennis game, be at match)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tennis game, be used to win tennis match)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tennis game, be used to win tennis match)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be used to win tennis match)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis game, be used to win tennis match)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at match)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tennis game, be at match)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)