tennis player: smash rackets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.78
, player
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.42
, hockey player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41
, baseball player
Weight: 0.40
, lacrosse player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
smash rackets 1.00
break rackets 0.94
change rackets 0.92
switch rackets 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tennis player, smash rackets)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, break rackets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tennis player, break rackets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, change rackets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tennis player, change rackets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tennis player, break rackets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tennis player, change rackets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tennis player, switch rackets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(tennis player, break rackets)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tennis player, switch rackets)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, switch rackets)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennis player, change rackets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tennis player, switch rackets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, smash rackets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tennis player, smash rackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tennis player, smash rackets)