tennis: was played

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was played 1.00
is played 0.98
be played 0.98
was played long ago 0.88
be how played 0.86
is play 0.84
be played on different surfaces 0.80
be played in india 0.80
was in 1500s 0.79
be played in silence 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sport, is play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sport, is play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sport, is play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sport, is play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(table tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis, was played)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennis, is played)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tennis, is played)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tennis, was played long ago)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tennis, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played in silence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be how played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tennis, be played in silence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played in silence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tennis, is play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played long ago)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tennis, is play)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tennis, is play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tennis, be how played)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tennis, be how played)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tennis, be how played)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tennis, be played in silence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tennis, be played in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tennis, was played long ago)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tennis, be played in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sport, is play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tennis, was played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sport, is play)