tennis: was played long ago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was played long ago 1.00
was played 0.88
is played 0.85
be played 0.84
was in 1500s 0.80
be how played 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(table tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tennis, was played long ago)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennis, is played)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tennis, be how played)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tennis, be how played)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tennis, is played)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tennis, be played)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis, was played)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tennis, be how played)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be how played)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tennis, was played long ago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played)