terminator: be good in second movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.65
, sequence
Weight: 0.64
, film
Weight: 0.62
, robot
Weight: 0.57
, machine
Weight: 0.54
Siblings batman
Weight: 0.33
, aliens
Weight: 0.33
, horror movie
Weight: 0.33
, vampire
Weight: 0.33
, movie star
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in second movie 1.00
be bad in first movie 0.96
be good in movie 0.93
is good movie 0.92
be bad in movie 0.90
is movie 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(terminator, be good in second movie)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(terminator, be good in movie)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(terminator, be bad in first movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(terminator, is movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(terminator, be good in movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(terminator, is movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(terminator, be good in movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(terminator, be bad in movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(terminator, be good in movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(terminator, is good movie)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(terminator, is movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(terminator, be bad in movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terminator, be bad in movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(terminator, be bad in movie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(terminator, is movie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(terminator, be bad in first movie)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(terminator, is good movie)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(terminator, be bad in first movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(terminator, is good movie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(terminator, is good movie)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(terminator, be bad in first movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(terminator, be good in second movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(terminator, be good in second movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(terminator, be good in second movie)