terrestrial planet: is more dense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents solar system
Weight: 0.66
, planet
Weight: 0.57
, sun
Weight: 0.40
Siblings earth
Weight: 0.65
, moon
Weight: 0.63
, planet earth
Weight: 0.38
, asteroid belt
Weight: 0.34
, solar wind
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more dense 1.00
is dense 0.97
be more dense than jovian 0.94
have than denser 0.87
is denser 0.86
have than jovian denser 0.86
have dense iron cores 0.81
have planets denser 0.80
have jovian planets denser 0.79
be high in density 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, be more dense than jovian)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, have than denser)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, be more dense than jovian)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, have than jovian denser)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, is denser)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, is denser)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, be more dense than jovian)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, have dense iron cores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, have dense iron cores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, have dense iron cores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, is denser)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, be high in density)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, have than jovian denser)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is dense)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, have than denser)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, is dense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, have dense iron cores)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, is dense)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, is dense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, be high in density)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is denser)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, have planets denser)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, have than jovian denser)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, be more dense than jovian)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, be high in density)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, have jovian planets denser)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, have than denser)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, have planets denser)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(terrestrial planet, have jovian planets denser)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, have than jovian denser)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, have jovian planets denser)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, be high in density)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, have planets denser)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(terrestrial planet, have jovian planets denser)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, have planets denser)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, have than denser)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(terrestrial planet, is more dense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(terrestrial planet, is more dense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(terrestrial planet, is more dense)