territory: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings palestine
Weight: 0.61
, guyana
Weight: 0.50
, vanuatu
Weight: 0.37
, tuvalu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
affect distribution of animal species 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(territory, be important to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(territory, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(territory, affect distribution of animal species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(territory, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)