terrorism: be issue in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.66
, religion
Weight: 0.64
, enemy
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.62
Siblings terrorist
Weight: 0.38
, corruption
Weight: 0.35
, war
Weight: 0.35
, piracy
Weight: 0.34
, torture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be issue in australia 1.00
affect india 0.78
be threat to uk 0.77
be prevalent in uk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(terrorism, be issue in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(terrorism, affect india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(terrorism, affect india)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, affect india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(terrorism, be threat to uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be threat to uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(terrorism, affect india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(terrorism, be threat to uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be threat to uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)