tester: be up up reelection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, role
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.51
, instrument
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.32
, thermistor
Weight: 0.32
, colorimeter
Weight: 0.32
, prototype
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be up up reelection 1.00
run for reelection 0.95
has state election 0.80
is election results 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tester, be up up reelection)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tester, run for reelection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tester, has state election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tester, is election results)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tester, run for reelection)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tester, has state election)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tester, is election results)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tester, run for reelection)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tester, has state election)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tester, is election results)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tester, run for reelection)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tester, has state election)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tester, is election results)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tester, be up up reelection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tester, be up up reelection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tester, be up up reelection)