testing: be better than humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experiment
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.61
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, practice
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings screening
Weight: 0.59
, test
Weight: 0.38
, vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.31
, example
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than humans 1.00
be better than studies 0.81
be better than correlational studies 0.77
be done on animals 0.76
be important in animals 0.76
be done on mice 0.76
be better than observational studies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experiment, be done on mice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(experiment, be done on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(experiment, be done on animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experiment, be done on mice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be done on mice)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be done on animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, be important in animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(testing, be better than humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experiment, be done on mice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(testing, be better than humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(testing, be better than humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(experiment, be done on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(testing, be better than humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(vaccination, be important in animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vaccination, be important in animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(testing, be better than humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(testing, be better than humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(experiment, be done on animals)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be done on mice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vaccination, be important in animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(experiment, be done on animals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(testing, be better than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be done on mice)