testing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experiment
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.61
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, practice
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings screening
Weight: 0.59
, test
Weight: 0.38
, vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.31
, example
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality standard 0.83
be good for business 0.80
has quality effect 0.78
has quality accuracy 0.77
improve performance 0.75
make perfect 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(practice, make perfect)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(practice, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(experiment, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(practice, improve performance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(practice, make perfect)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(experiment, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(practice, make perfect)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(practice, improve performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(screening, has quality effect)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality accuracy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(practice, make perfect)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(practice, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(test, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(test, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(test, has quality accuracy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(test, has quality accuracy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(screening, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(screening, has quality effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(testing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(testing, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(practice, improve performance)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(practice, make perfect)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(test, has quality accuracy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(screening, has quality effect)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(practice, improve performance)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(practice, make perfect)