testing: is idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experiment
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.61
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, practice
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings screening
Weight: 0.59
, test
Weight: 0.38
, vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.31
, example
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is idea 1.00
is good idea 0.96
be considered thing 0.76
be considered good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, be considered good thing)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, be considered thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(vaccination, be considered thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vaccination, be considered thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(vaccination, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vaccination, be considered good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(testing, is idea)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(testing, is good idea)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(testing, is good idea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(testing, is good idea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(testing, is good idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, is idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(testing, is idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(vaccination, be considered thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, is idea)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(vaccination, be considered good thing)