texas: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
was great in 1861 0.96
is big 0.80
compare to great britain 0.76
was drawn into great depression 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(arizona, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(texas, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arizona, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arizona, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(california, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(arizona, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(texas, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(oklahoma, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(california, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(california, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(texas, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(texas, was great in 1861)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(texas, was great in 1861)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, was great in 1861)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(texas, was drawn into great depression)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(texas, was great in 1861)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(texas, was drawn into great depression)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(texas, is big)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(texas, was drawn into great depression)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(texas, was drawn into great depression)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(texas, is big)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(texas, is big)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(texas, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arizona, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(california, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(texas, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arizona, is great)