textbook: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bible
Weight: 0.63
, math book
Weight: 0.61
, cheque book
Weight: 0.33
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, dissertation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be bad for game 0.78
has quality question 0.76
has quality resource 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality question)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality questions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality definition)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality resource)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality definition)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality definition)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality questions)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality question)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality questions)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)