textbook: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bible
Weight: 0.63
, math book
Weight: 0.61
, cheque book
Weight: 0.33
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, dissertation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be made better 0.83
has quality resource 0.77
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.77
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(textbook, be made better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, be made better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(textbook, be made better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality question)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(textbook, be made better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality questions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(textbook, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)