texture: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	characteristic Weight: 0.66 , aspect Weight: 0.64 , feature Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.59 , element Weight: 0.59
Siblings	flavor Weight: 0.36 , hair color Weight: 0.36 , hardness Weight: 0.35 , color Weight: 0.35 , palette Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(color, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(texture, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(texture, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(color, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(color, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(texture, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(texture, has quality bad)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(texture, has quality bad)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality bad)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(texture, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(color, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(texture, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)