theatre: be better than film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.54
, attraction
Weight: 0.54
, building
Weight: 0.53
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.29
, city hall
Weight: 0.28
, central park
Weight: 0.28
, topic
Weight: 0.28
, apartment building
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than film 1.00
be better than movies 0.92
be better than ever 0.81
act different from movie acting 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(theatre, be better than film)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(theatre, be better than movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(theatre, be better than movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(theatre, be better than movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(theatre, be better than movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(theatre, be better than ever)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(theatre, be better than ever)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(theatre, act different from movie acting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(theatre, be better than ever)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(theatre, act different from movie acting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theatre, act different from movie acting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(theatre, act different from movie acting)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(theatre, be better than ever)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(theatre, be better than film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(theatre, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(theatre, be better than film)