theatre: was popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.54
, attraction
Weight: 0.54
, building
Weight: 0.53
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.29
, city hall
Weight: 0.28
, central park
Weight: 0.28
, topic
Weight: 0.28
, apartment building
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular 1.00
is popular 0.95
was popular in times 0.88
was popular during renaissance 0.80
was popular in shakespeare times 0.80
was in 1593 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theatre, is popular)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theatre, is popular)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theatre, is popular)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular in times)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular in times)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular in times)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(theatre, was in 1593)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(theatre, was in 1593)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theatre, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(theatre, was in 1593)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was in 1593)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular during renaissance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(central park, is popular)