theatre: was popular in times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.54
, attraction
Weight: 0.54
, building
Weight: 0.53
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.29
, city hall
Weight: 0.28
, central park
Weight: 0.28
, topic
Weight: 0.28
, apartment building
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular in times 1.00
was popular in shakespeare times 0.89
was popular 0.88
is popular 0.82
was popular during renaissance 0.79
was in 1593 0.78
was outlawed during times 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular in times)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theatre, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theatre, is popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(theatre, was in 1593)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in shakespeare times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theatre, is popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(theatre, was in 1593)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(theatre, was in 1593)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theatre, was popular during renaissance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was in 1593)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theatre, is popular)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular during renaissance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theatre, was popular in times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(theatre, was popular in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(central park, is popular)