theme: writing response

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.68
, part
Weight: 0.62
, tune
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings philosophy
Weight: 0.66
, pattern
Weight: 0.66
, identity
Weight: 0.64
, mystery
Weight: 0.63
, romance
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
writing response 1.00
writing response to literature essay 0.89
be important in writing 0.81
be written in aramaic 0.77
is written 0.77
be written in way 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(part, be written in aramaic)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(theme, writing response)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(part, be written in aramaic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(part, be written in aramaic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in writing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(romance, is written)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(part, be written in aramaic)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(theme, writing response)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(romance, is written)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(romance, is written)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pattern, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(pattern, be important in writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(theme, writing response)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response to literature essay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(theme, writing response to literature essay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(theme, writing response to literature essay)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(theme, writing response to literature essay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(theme, writing response)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(part, be written in aramaic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(romance, is written)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pattern, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(theme, writing response)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(part, be written in aramaic)