theology: is science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.63
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, science
Weight: 0.58
Siblings metaphysics
Weight: 0.36
, philosophy
Weight: 0.35
, teaching
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.34
, mathematics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is science 1.00
be queen of science 0.85
queen of science 0.84
be called queen of science 0.84
be known as queen of sciences 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(metaphysics, be queen of science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(metaphysics, be queen of science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(metaphysics, be queen of science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(theology, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(theology, be queen of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(theology, be called queen of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(theology, queen of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(theology, be queen of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(theology, be queen of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(theology, be called queen of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(theology, queen of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(theology, be called queen of science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(theology, queen of science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(theology, be known as queen of sciences)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(theology, be queen of science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(theology, be known as queen of sciences)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(theology, be known as queen of sciences)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(theology, be known as queen of sciences)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(theology, queen of science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theology, be called queen of science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metaphysics, be queen of science)